JFK Assassination Meets TV Fakery: The Zapruder Film Is A Fraud!

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Blogplay

This entry was posted on Friday, March 19th, 2010 at 8:13 pm and is filed under freemason. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

10 Responses to “JFK Assassination Meets TV Fakery: The Zapruder Film Is A Fraud!”

  1. Jalilede Says:

    this is utterly tragic to me, it’s important that we, ordinary citizens, investigate this thoroughly…who else will? But then, what to do after sufficient evidence has been surmounted, who to trust to bring it to?

  2. ChastityArgyle Says:

    Quite convincing stuff

  3. dashizzle100 Says:

    jergy fergy kergy bergy pergy ergy…nergy dergy..wergy.

  4. Blacquenhard Says:

    Looks like Jacqueline shot JFK in the head.

  5. jonkabbash Says:

    Read “Reclaiming History” by Vincent Bugliosi, It’s 1.5 Million words long and very detailed..he worked on it for 20 years and He does a better job than I can, plus I’m too lazy to post all the oswald evidence for people who won’t believe it anyway.

  6. xXSimonJCPXx Says:

    Vincent Bugliosi’s work has been thoroughly debunked.

  7. gr8guy71 Says:

    I JUST READ IT AND YOUR RIGHT.

  8. starmanskye Says:

    The evidence is heavily weighted against LHO being the lone assassin; IMHO, the Z film was NOT an all-out fraud. Undoubtedly it was tampered with to disguise & hide key info, ie. eliminate limo braking, minimize the back-and-to-the-left motion which is the Grassy Knoll ‘tell’ of fatal shot. IF Z’s film was an absolute fraud, the lone shooter ‘evidence’ would be unambigious, the film would have been publicly shown from the beginning & not hidden-away until the HSCA investigation.

  9. starmanskye Says:

    @jonkabbash — That ANYBODY would read Bugliosi’s screed & not see thru the first dozen distortions & sloppy ‘logic’ w/o realizing its a put-up job is a testament to the mass-media/public-ed dumbing-down of America. It took Bugliosi 1.5 million words to argue around such inconvenient facts as there were at LEAST 4 shots fired, of which Oswald could ONLY have shot 3. And that’s IF he even shot the rusty, scope-misaligned rifle, incapable of 3-in. accuracy. 90% of CIA’s ops are ‘conspiracies’.

  10. greasynest Says:

    bla bla…more bla bla omG even more bla bla , research “zionist’ Jfk 1 of the endless ,until U find god.

 

Leave a Reply

 

About - Contact - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service